Organic Connection – Organic Food Issues & More


Film: What’s Organic About Organic?
January 15, 2008, 10:29 am
Filed under: organic industry, USDA Organic

Told through the voices of farmers, “What’s Organic About ‘Organic’?” delves into the issues that arise when a grassroots agricultural movement evolves into a booming international market. As the film moves from farm fields to government meetings to industry trade shows, we meet four farmers who are involved in different aspects of the organic world. Because, when you stop to think about it – from the farmers on the ground to the citizens at the grocery store, from government bureaucracy to the global economy – how do we really understand what’s organic about “organic”?

From the filmmaker:

I am pleased to present to you a teaser/trailer for the documentary film that I have been working on for the past two years, “What’s Organic About ‘Organic’?” The film will not only offer viewers a glimpse into the lives of the farmers/characters who breathe life into the organic movement, but also will help foster an awareness of the issues at the heart of conscientious consumption and responsible citizenship.

View the trailer



Organic Farm Bill
December 18, 2007, 5:56 pm
Filed under: organic farming, organic industry

By Matthew Wilde, WCF Courier, December 16

It appears the federal government will finally deliver something to producers: Help. Congress has proposed hundreds of millions of dollars for organic farmers and consumers in the farm bill currently being debated.

To boost organic production, the House and the Senate have each proposed the industry receive a bigger piece of the farm budget.

The House passed a $286 billion, five-year bill in July. It includes $365 million for grants and research into such things as pest and disease management — crucial for an industry that doesn’t allow man-made chemicals — and marketing and education. The House wants to spend $22 million in new funding to help farmers transition to organic agriculture and $3 million for organic marketing data collection and publication.

Senators, though, are still debating their version of the bill. The Senate wants to spend the same amount of money on grants and research and to help farmers get certified. Plus, $30 million for farmers market promotion and $24 million in new money for technical assistance to address export barriers for specialty crops. The Conservation Security Program would be funded and made nationwide instead of helping certain watersheds under the Senate version.

“It will reward organic farmers, who will prosper from payments for conservation practices such as long-term crop rotation … including (planting) perennial prospect forages. Those are two key issues we’re looking at,” said Kathleen Delate, organic agriculture expert at Iowa State University.

read more (WCFCourier.com)



How to Add Oomph to ‘Organic’
August 21, 2007, 9:14 pm
Filed under: organic industry

By ANDREW MARTIN, New York Times, August 19, 2007

The organic industry has gone wild in the last decade, but you wouldn’t know it at the Department of Agriculture.

Despite year after year of double-digit growth, organics receive a pittance in financing and staff attention at the department, which is responsible for writing regulations about organics and making sure that they are upheld.

The National Organic Program, which regulates the industry, has just nine staff members and an annual budget of $1.5 million. A Florida real estate developer named Maurice Wilder received more than that in farm subsidies in 2005, some $1,754,916, to be exact, according to a subsidy database maintained by the Environmental Working Group.

Other parts of the Department of Agriculture spend roughly $28 million or so a year on organic research, data collection and farmer assistance. It may sound significant, but the department spent far more than that, $37 million, subsidizing farmers who grew dry peas in 2005. (The farm value of dry peas is about $83 million a year. Consumers spend more than $14 billion a year on organic food, up from $3.6 billion in 1997.)

It’s not entirely surprising that organics are such a low priority at the department and in Congress. Both the agency and farm-state members of Congress are reliable cheerleaders for industrialized agriculture, and Big Ag has often viewed organics with suspicion, if not outright disdain.

read more (New York Times)




Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.